SF Early Care & Education: Critical Choices

$574M in Baby Prop C reserves sit unused while families 151-200% AMI receive zero subsidies. Explore the data and policy scenarios.

Data: CA R&R Network • SFUSD • DEC • SF Examiner Nov 2025

📊 Current State: 2025

2025 Current 2017 Peak Reference
SF Children 0-5
44,556
Total population
Peak: 52,222 (2017)
Licensed Capacity
30,496
Operational spaces
Peak: 31,713 (2023)
DEC Enrolled
10,400
Subsidized programs
23.3% of 0-5 pop
DEC Budget FY26
$337M
77% to Early Learning
Waitlist
738
Nov 2025
Capacity Change
-1,217
2023→2025 net loss

💰 ELFA Subsidy Tiers (Early Learning Family Assistance)

≤110% AMI
FREE
Full tuition credit
111-150% AMI
50% Credit
Half tuition covered
151-200% AMI
$0
NO subsidies despite Baby Prop C
>200% AMI
Private Pay
~$3,771/mo infant

🚨 Baby Prop C: The $574M Question

In 2018, SF voters passed Baby Prop C to expand subsidies to families earning up to 200% AMI (~$207,000 for family of 4). Seven years later, that promise remains unfulfilled.

$574M
Reserves accumulated
151-200%
AMI families excluded
$781M
Invested since 2021

"There's no excuse. We have to move quickly." — Norman Yee, former Board President & Baby Prop C co-author

🏢 Licensed Centers (426)

Infant Center (0-2)
7,762
Dedicated infant licenses
Day Care Center
15,117
Mixed ages 0-5*
School Age (5-17)
2,005
Peak: 5,760 (2017)
Single Licensed
1,751
Age range unclear*
Operational Center Capacity
25,684
(26,635 licensed - 951 pending)

🏠 Family Child Care (910 homes)

Large FCC (280)
3,870
Up to 14 children
Small FCC (630)
5,040
Up to 8 children
Est. Infant Capacity
~2,300
Based on licensing*
Change from 2023
-39 homes
+162 capacity
CA FCC Licensing Rules (infant limits):
• Small FCC: Max 4 infants OR 3 in mixed-age group
• Large FCC: Max 4 infants (12 total) OR 3 infants (14 total if criteria met)
• Infant = under 24 months
Total FCC Capacity
8,910

👶 Child Population (0-5): 2017-2025

PEAK
2017
52,222
2019
51,884
-0.6%
2021
48,713
-6.1%
2023
46,654
-4.2%
2025
44,556
-14.7% from peak

🎓 TK Expansion: 2020-2025

2020-21
504
3.0 req/seat
2021-22
476
3.2 req/seat
2022-23
723
+52%
4.3 req/seat
2023-24
1,056
+46%
5.0 req/seat
2024-25
1,994
+89%
5.9 GE / 7.5 Lang

+296% growth since 2020 • 98.2% utilization (1,959/1,994)

🎯 DEC 5-Year Enrollment Plan

FY26
10,400
Current
FY27
11,000
+600
FY28
12,000
+1,000
FY29
12,500
+500
The Math Problem: DEC needs +700 spaces/year • Building +300/year • Lost -1,217 (2023-25)
System contracting faster than DEC can expand

Explore Policy Scenarios

Each choice creates ripple effects. Who benefits? Who loses?

Scenario B: TK Expansion First

"Kindergarten readiness starts at age 4"
Focus: Expand SFUSD TK capacity rapidly
✓ More 4-year-olds get free TK
✗ FCCs lose revenue, closures follow
? OST capacity for TK families

Scenario C: Build from Birth

"Invest in the foundation years (0-3)"
Focus: Expand infant/toddler capacity, stabilize FCCs
✓ Parents can return to work
✓ Brain development 0-3 window
? Can't prove readiness impact

Scenario D: System Stability First

"Stop the bleeding, then expand"
Focus: Prevent closures, build OST, retain workforce
✓ Preserve provider ecosystem
✓ Maintain infant/toddler access
✗ Slower enrollment growth

Scenario E: Fix the Data First

"We're flying blind — turn on the lights"
Focus: Add ECE questions to kindergarten forms
✓ Evidence-based decisions
✓ Prove ROI on investments
✗ 1-2 year delay before shifts

Scenario Title

Tagline